Go Back   2023 2024 MBA > MBA > Online MBA Discussions

  #1  
Old 10th November 2016, 10:12 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Default MHT MBA CET previous year papers

Discuss about mht MBA cet previous year papers here. Welcome to MBA.ind.in and this page is for mht MBA cet previous year papers discussion. If you are looking for mht MBA cet previous year papers then ask your question is as much details as possible in the “Quick Reply” box provided below. The more detailed your question will be, the more easy will it be for our experts to answers your query. And if you have any information on mht MBA cet previous year papers, then please share you knowledge with our viewers in the “Quick Reply” box. You knowledge can help many people. Thanks for stopping by at MBA.ind.in. Please visit again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #2  
Old 9th April 2018, 10:21 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Default Re: mht MBA cet previous year papers

I want the previous year paper of Maharashtra Common Entrance Test MHT MBA CET exam so can you provide me?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 9th April 2018, 10:22 AM
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Default Re: mht MBA cet previous year papers

I am providing you the previous year question paper of Maharashtra Common Entrance Test MHT MBA CET exam

MHT MBA CET exam question paper

DIRECTIONS for the question: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.

Question No. : 1
With Finance Commission recommendations, Centre‐state relations set to undergo dramatic change Any big change requires
big ideas, decisive leadership and happy coincidence of circumstances. Nothing illustrates this better than the unfolding story
of cooperative federalism in India.
As chief minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi had often argued that the central government implemented schemes were at odds
with the state's needs and priorities. For example, schemes that provided funds for electrification were at best of limited value
to Gujarat since it had already achieved near 100% electrification.
This state could have spent the money provided for such a scheme more productively if allowed to use it for other purposes.
In advancing this view, Modi was joined by other chief ministers such as Vasundhara Raje of Rajasthan who argued that the vast
numbers of central schemes further restricted their fiscal space because many of them required matching contributions by
them from their otherwise untied funds. Once these matching funds were committed to access central schemes, states were left
with very limited funds for even the most important expenditure items such as enforcement of law and order.
Nevertheless, this system has remained entrenched in one form or another in the last several decades on account of
coincidence of three factors. First, outside of state leaders and a few economists and policy analysts, advocates of the view that
true federalism means giving greater fiscal space to states and trusting them in setting their own priorities have been few and
far between.
Second, the Finance Commission appointed once every five years plays a key role in the division of tax revenues between
Centre and states. Consistent with the first point, successive Finance Commissions held untied funds to the states at or below
30% of the divisible tax pool. Only the 13th Finance Commission exceeded this mark, setting states' share at 32%.
Finally, successive central governments have chosen to transfer the bulk of the remaining funds to the states via central and
centrally sponsored schemes. With nearly 8% growth over an entire decade, tax revenues have significantly expanded.
Alongside, central and centrally sponsored schemes and the revenue resources they absorb have expanded dramatically as well.
Two key factors have come together to dramatically alter this equilibrium.One, India now has a prime minister who was once a
chief minister and strongly feels that cooperative federalism means greater fiscal and legislative space for states. And two, by a
happy coincidence, the chairman and members of the 14th Finance Commission believe in genuine federalism themselves.
Moreover, they have recognised the opportunity offered by a prime minister at the helm who truly believes in the power of
states and their leaders. Accordingly , they have recommended that starting 2015‐16, states be awarded 42% of the divisible
pool of tax revenues.This is a gigantic and unprecedented 10% jump in devolution.
Predictably , the prime minister and his Cabinet have accepted this bold recommendation of the 14th Finance Commission.
What implications does this change have? For starters, with larger transfers coming as untied funds, states also have greater
responsibility in discharging their duties. It is likely that they will now have to take greater responsibility in areas that have been
hitherto covered by the Centre, especially those falling on the state list. States will also have to do this in ways that are more
consistent with their priorities and not according to one size fits all schemes. By the same token, with a lower share in the
divisible pool the Centre's fiscal space will shrink, requiring a rethink of central and centrally sponsored schemes.
One might ask where does Niti Aayog fit into this story? I am tempted to say that in replacing the Planning Commission by Niti
Aayog, Prime Minister Modi may have anticipated the 14th Finance Commission. Under the previous regime, the Centre was
often seen as giver and states as recipients thereby making the latter feel that they were less than equal partners. In
replacing the Planning Commission by Niti Aayog, the prime
minister sought to change that equation and forge an equal relationship between the two sides. As such this change represents
a step towards cooperative federalism.
We will have a more complete picture of the emerging Centre‐state relations this Saturday when the finance minister presents
the budget. But even with what we now know, one thing is clear: in the years to come, Niti Aayog will have to play a much
greater role in the knowledge space. Greater fiscal freedom combined with greater legislative freedom in areas covered by the
concurrent list of the Constitution means that states will need to play a more active role in designing their own programmes
and policies.
As they do so, they will need to reach out to data, analysis and expert advice.The design of Niti Aayog as per the Cabinet Note
of 1 January 2015 positions it well to provide these services. By the same token, those of us at Niti Aayog have to work hard in
the months to come to build new strengths so that we do not disappoint the states that reach out to us for advice and
assistance. We shall see.
As the Chief Minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi why argued that the Central Government implemented schemes are at odds
for the state government?

A﴿ Because the Central Government was not paying the equal amount of funds for all the states.
B﴿ Because, he being from the opposition, want to criticize the steps taken by the Central Govenrment and leave an
impression on the general public mind that what a crook central government is.
C﴿ Because Central Government doesn't take in the picture all the perspective while allocating the funds.
D﴿ Because he wanted more funds for filling his and his cabinet minister's pocket

Explanation:‐ From lines "As chief minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi a scheme more productively if allowed to use it for other
purposes."
it can be inferred that option 3 is correct.

DIRECTIONS for the question: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.

Question No. : 2

With Finance Commission recommendations, Centre‐state relations set to undergo dramatic change Any big change requires
big ideas, decisive leadership and happy coincidence of circumstances. Nothing illustrates this better than the unfolding story
of cooperative federalism in India.
As chief minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi had often argued that the central government implemented schemes were at odds
with the state's needs and priorities. For example, schemes that provided funds for electrification were at best of limited value
to Gujarat since it had already achieved near 100% electrification.
This state could have spent the money provided for such a scheme more productively if allowed to use it for other purposes.
In advancing this view, Modi was joined by other chief ministers such as Vasundhara Raje of Rajasthan who argued that the vast
numbers of central schemes further restricted their fiscal space because many of them required matching contributions by
them from their otherwise untied funds. Once these matching funds were committed to access central schemes, states were left
with very limited funds for even the most important expenditure items such as enforcement of law and order.
Nevertheless, this system has remained entrenched in one form or another in the last several decades on account of
coincidence of three factors. First, outside of state leaders and a few economists and policy analysts, advocates of the view that
true federalism means giving greater fiscal space to states and trusting them in setting their own priorities have been few and
far between.
Second, the Finance Commission appointed once every five years plays a key role in the division of tax revenues between
Centre and states. Consistent with the first point, successive Finance Commissions held untied funds to the states at or below
30% of the divisible tax pool. Only the 13th Finance Commission exceeded this mark, setting states' share at 32%.
Finally, successive central governments have chosen to transfer the bulk of the remaining funds to the states via central and
centrally sponsored schemes. With nearly 8% growth over an entire decade, tax revenues have significantly expanded.
Alongside, central and centrally sponsored schemes and the revenue resources they absorb have expanded dramatically as well.
Two key factors have come together to dramatically alter this equilibrium.One, India now has a prime minister who was once a
chief minister and strongly feels that cooperative federalism means greater fiscal and legislative space for states. And two, by a
happy coincidence, the chairman and members of the 14th Finance Commission believe in genuine federalism themselves.
Moreover, they have recognised the opportunity offered by a prime minister at the helm who truly believes in the power of
states and their leaders. Accordingly , they have recommended that starting 2015‐16, states be awarded 42% of the divisible
pool of tax revenues.This is a gigantic and unprecedented 10% jump in devolution.
Predictably , the prime minister and his Cabinet have accepted this bold recommendation of the 14th Finance Commission.
What implications does this change have? For starters, with larger transfers coming as untied funds, states also have greater
responsibility in discharging their duties. It is likely that they will now have to take greater responsibility in areas that have been
hitherto covered by the Centre, especially those falling on the state list. States will also have to do this in ways that are more
consistent with their priorities and not according to one size fits all schemes. By the same token, with a lower share in the
divisible pool the Centre's fiscal space will shrink, requiring a rethink of central and centrally sponsored schemes.
One might ask where does Niti Aayog fit into this story? I am tempted to say that in replacing the Planning Commission by Niti
Aayog, Prime Minister Modi may have anticipated the 14th Finance Commission. Under the previous regime, the Centre was
often seen as giver and states as recipients thereby making the latter feel that they were less than equal partners. In
replacing the Planning Commission by Niti Aayog, the prime
minister sought to change that equation and forge an equal relationship between the two sides. As such this change represents
a step towards cooperative federalism.
We will have a more complete picture of the emerging Centre‐state relations this Saturday when the finance minister presents
the budget. But even with what we now know, one thing is clear: in the years to come, Niti Aayog will have to play a much
greater role in the knowledge space. Greater fiscal freedom combined with greater legislative freedom in areas covered by the
concurrent list of the Constitution means that states will need to play a more active role in designing their own programmes
and policies.
As they do so, they will need to reach out to data, analysis and expert advice.The design of Niti Aayog as per the Cabinet Note
of 1 January 2015 positions it well to provide these services. By the same token, those of us at Niti Aayog have to work hard in
the months to come to build new strengths so that we do not disappoint the states that reach out to us for advice and
assistance. We shall see.

Why Vasundhara Raje decided to join the views of Narendra Modi?

A﴿ Being from the same party, she had no choice but to join hand in hand with her party leader.
B﴿ Vasundhra Raje and Narendra Modi had a hidden plan of going against any of the good initiatives taken by the Central
Government.
C﴿ Vasundhra Raje was also facing the atrocities of Central Government and want to raise her voice with Narendra Modi.
D﴿

Vasundhra Raje, being a Chief Minister of a state of India, where central schemes are restricted the fiscal space of the
state government, feels that it is injustice on the part of Central Government.


MHT MBA CET exam question paper
drive.google.com/file/d/0B_V4Kkm2koFqYWlNOURYNXBycGM/view
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MH CET MBA Previous Year Papers Download kavita Online MBA Discussions 4 8th April 2018 05:04 PM
JMET previous year papers Unregistered Main Forum 2 7th April 2018 11:25 PM
Previous Year AFCAT Papers Pdf Unregistered Main Forum 2 21st March 2018 12:49 PM
Previous Year Papers of Manipal PMT Unregistered Main Forum 2 19th March 2018 01:36 PM
CMAT Previous Year Papers Unregistered Main Forum 1 24th November 2016 04:15 PM
IPU CET Medical Previous Year Papers Unregistered Main Forum 1 19th November 2016 11:42 AM
UPSEE Previous Year Papers Unregistered Main Forum 1 10th November 2016 06:54 PM
BVP CET Previous Year Question Papers Unregistered Main Forum 1 10th November 2016 11:46 AM
RRB Chandigarh Previous Year Papers Unregistered Main Forum 1 9th November 2016 03:30 PM
LIC ADO Previous Year Papers Unregistered Main Forum 1 7th November 2016 06:15 PM
MH CET Previous Year Papers Unregistered Main Forum 1 17th October 2016 12:30 PM
IPU CET Previous Year Papers MCA Unregistered Main Forum 1 17th October 2016 12:25 PM
Previous year papers of MBA CET Unregistered Main Forum 1 10th November 2015 11:58 AM
AUCET Previous Year Papers Unregistered Main Forum 0 16th July 2015 03:53 PM
SLIET Previous Year Papers Unregistered Main Forum 0 16th July 2015 10:26 AM
PU OCET previous year papers Unregistered Main Forum 0 11th July 2015 10:35 AM
RTU Previous Year Question Papers Unregistered Main Forum 0 8th July 2015 04:16 PM
CDS Solved Papers of Previous Year Dr Monika Shashanki Main Forum 1 9th November 2012 03:14 PM
DU question papers previous year nayeem kha Main Forum 1 16th August 2012 12:42 PM
VTU Previous Year Question Papers 7th SEM CSE pankaj chandel Main Forum 0 30th June 2012 05:16 PM


Quick Reply
Your Username: Click here to log in

Message:
Options

Thread Tools Search this Thread



All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

1 2