#2
| |||
| |||
Re: Netbackup HCL
For capacity overseers searching for a more costefficient, solid, adaptable, and simpler to utilize answers for reinforcement, filing and recuperation, protest stockpiling is a great goal target. Customarily, reinforcement applications required plate stockpiling to imitate tape or be privately mounted to the media server. Veritas NetBackup adaptation 7.7.1 or later can now locally use protest stockpiling utilizing the S3 API. This sort of capacity offers a few appealing abilities for these workloads, including: ● Nearly boundless adaptability of limit without diminishing execution. Not any more running into hard limit impediments of a capacity storehouse, driving you to reuse your reinforcement information or potentially oversee it crosswise over numerous namespaces. ● Automatic fiasco recuperation security by repeating information offsite. Bunch hubs can exist in different physical areas, so you don't have to stress over pulling media to the mountain any longer. ● Costefficient equipment framework in view of standard servers, Ethernetbased organizing, also, moderate plate drives instead of on more costly restrictive arrangements. That is the preferred standpoint of software defined capacity. This attached file below has the information which will assist you through the particular strides you have to take to ideally arrange Veritas NetBackup to use a SwiftStack protest stockpiling group for nearline reinforcement. In the event that you have questions when outlining, testing, or sending SwiftStack with NetBackup Integrating NetBackup 7.7.x with SwiftStack Object Storage learn.swiftstack.com/rs/034-CBF-009/images/SwiftStack-Runbook-NetBackup-7-7x-v1.pdf Last edited by sumit; 30th May 2017 at 10:28 AM. |